Opportunities
Grants, VC funds, accelerators, and competitions for African entrepreneurs.
Grants, VC funds, accelerators, and competitions for African entrepreneurs.
What are you looking for today?
Powered by CopilotKit
€10,000 - €15,000
Research fellowships for women scientists in Sub-Saharan Africa. Awards €10,000 to doctoral candidates and €15,000 to post-doctoral researchers conducting research in formal, life, environmental, physical, engineering, or technological sciences. In 2026, the programme awards 38 grants (30 doctoral + 8 post-doctoral) through a newly unified Pan-African platform merging the former South Africa national and SSA regional programmes.
Doctoral Grant
€10,000 research grant for 30 selected doctoral candidates
Post-doctoral Grant
€15,000 research grant for 8 selected post-doctoral researchers
Training Programme
Bespoke training to strengthen leadership and scientific communication skills
Pan-African Community
Membership in a network of L'Oréal-UNESCO women scientists across Africa
Global Visibility
International recognition through the L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science brand
Formal Sciences
Mathematics, computer science, statistics
Life Sciences
Biology, medicine, health sciences, agricultural sciences
Environmental Sciences
Ecology, earth sciences, climate research
Physical Sciences
Physics, chemistry, materials science
Engineering Sciences
All branches of engineering
Technological Sciences
Applied technology research and innovation
Women scientists at doctoral or early post-doctoral career stage conducting research within Sub-Saharan African institutions. Scientific excellence is the primary criterion — the research project must be rigorous, impactful, and clearly communicated. Strong publication records and the ability to promote science to broader audiences are valued.
I could not confirm, from third-party sources, what structured support recipients receive after selection beyond the fellowship/grant itself.
No credible third-party applicant complaints, scam reports, or negative experience write-ups were found in the accessible sources. That absence is not proof of no issues; it only means I could not verify any red flags from independent sources.
I could not verify third-party alumni testimonials, applicant reviews, or practical application advice from sources outside the official For Women in Science website using the available search tools. No reliable off-site applicant guidance was found, so no insider tip can be responsibly extracted.
1998
Active Since
Yes
Deploying